Regional co-operation
has been good for at least part of the continent
By The
Economist
WHEN
the first East African Community (EAC) collapsed in 1977, some in the Kenyan
government celebrated with champagne.
Since
its resurrection in 2000, officials are more often found toasting its success.
A regional club of six countries, the EAC is now the most integrated trading
bloc on the continent.
Its
members agreed on a customs union in 2005, and a common market in 2010. The
region is richer and more peaceful as a result, argues a new paper* from the International
Growth Centre, a research organisation.
Many
things boost trade, from growth to international deals. The researchers use
some fancy modelling to pick out the effect of the EAC.
They
find that bilateral trade between member countries was a whopping 213% higher
in 2011 than it would otherwise have been.
Trade
gains from other regional blocs in the continent are smaller: around 110% in
the Southern African Development Community (SADC), and 80% in the Common Market
for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA).
Those
numbers for the EAC are all the more impressive because the available data stop
before the EAC’s common market had properly come into effect. Progress on that
front has sometimes stuttered.
A 2014
“scorecard” identified 51 non-tariff barriers. Full implementation could double
the income gains seen so far, say the researchers. Not surprisingly, it is
landlocked Rwanda which would see the biggest benefits. Tanzania, which has
dragged its feet on integration, would profit the least.
The
researchers are warier of the EAC’s other grand project: creating a common
currency by 2024. The impact on trade would be small, they say, and not worth
the risks.
A study
last year by the IMF found that east African economies move out of sync with
each other, using exchange rates to absorb shocks.
Greater
convergence might make a common currency viable; without it, a single currency
would mean that wages might have to do the work of adjustment, as Greece has
become painfully aware. The euro crisis should give policymakers pause for
thought.
Political
convergence matters too. Recent squabbles over railways and an oil pipeline
show the difficulty of coaxing headstrong leaders to cooperate. But
interdependence has reduced the risk of war, the researchers argue.
Regional
trade blocs make sense for Africa. National economies are small: at market
exchange rates, the combined GDP of the EAC, home to 170m people, is less than
New Zealand’s.
Regional
groupings have more clout, and could one day form a continental free-trade area
(a planned link-up between the EAC, COMESA and SADC is a start). Then the
champagne corks would really start popping.
*‘Regional Trade Agreements and
the pacification of Eastern Africa’, Thierry Mayer and Mathias Thoenig,
International Growth Centre Working Paper, April 2016
0 comments:
Post a Comment